The Supreme Court has upheld Biden administration regulations aimed at reducing methane emissions from oil and gas facilities, as well as regulations aimed at curbing toxic pollutants from coal-fired power plants. The court rejected emergency applications to block these regulations, allowing litigation against the EPA to continue in lower courts. The methane regulation, finalized in March, aims to reduce methane emissions by up to 80% over the next 14 years. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas contributing to climate change. Republican states and industry groups have challenged the regulation, arguing that it goes beyond the allowable limits under the Clean Air Act and unfairly restricts power plants. In contrast, the mercury regulation, also upheld by the court, tightens restrictions on hazardous pollutants like mercury, arsenic, and chromium. The EPA estimates that the new regulation will provide health benefits of $300 million by reducing exposure to carcinogens. The court’s decision on these regulations signifies a continued effort to combat climate change and protect public health, despite opposition from industry groups and conservative states. The Biden administration, represented by Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, argued that the regulations give states a model to follow, rather than imposing strict mandates. The court’s decision underscores the importance of prioritizing environmental protections and reducing harmful emissions to address climate change and protect public health.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com