The U.S. government’s case against Sean “Diddy” Combs concluded today after more than six weeks, during which prosecutors presented 34 witnesses and graphic evidence alleged to be linked to a criminal enterprise led by the hip-hop mogul. Diddy’s defense team did not call any witnesses but submitted evidence and made a motion under Rule 29 to dismiss the case, asserting that the prosecution’s evidence was insufficient for a conviction. Judge Arun Subramanian delayed his ruling on this request.
As the trial progresses toward its concluding phase, jurors will take a day off while the judge and attorneys prepare instructions for deliberation. Closing arguments are expected to start on Thursday. During the proceedings, defense attorney Teny Geragos questioned a Homeland Security agent regarding texts that implicated Diddy’s ex-girlfriend in arranging encounters with sex workers. The jury viewed explicit videos, which are central to the charges of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking.
In a notable moment, Diddy assured the judge that he felt well and confirmed that he would not testify in his defense, attributing the choice solely to himself. Although the defense’s motion for acquittal is anticipated to be denied—a typical outcome in such cases—it’s a procedural formality to preserve arguments for potential appeals. Legal analysts see the decision not to call witnesses as a cautious strategy from Diddy’s experienced legal team, reflecting a practical approach rather than one rooted in either confidence or desperation. As the trial continues, NBC’s “Dateline” is releasing special episodes summarizing developments.
Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.
