A debate has arisen among fellows of the UK’s Royal Society regarding the potential re-election of former president Sir Paul Nurse as the head of the institution. Nurse, a geneticist and Nobel laureate, served as president from 2010-15 and is now being considered for the role again after Sir Adrian Smith’s term ends next year. The society’s council has nominated Nurse for the position, but some fellows are divided over the prospect. Concerns have been raised about the perception that the society is a “boys’ club” and lacks diversity in leadership.
While some fellow believe Nurse has the experience and credentials to lead the institution effectively, others argue that it is time for new voices and perspectives to take the helm. The absence of a female president in the Royal Society’s history has also been highlighted as a point of contention. The debate has sparked discussion about the tradition of not electing a president twice, as well as the need for a forward-thinking and diverse leadership team.
Supporters of Nurse’s re-election emphasize his scientific achievements, communication skills, and experience working with government. They believe he is the best candidate for the role, despite concerns about age and lack of diversity in leadership. The Royal Society is currently conducting the voting process for the president-elect position, with the outcome expected to be determined by the fellowship in a confidential manner.
Source
Photo credit www.theguardian.com